Wednesday, November 7, 2012

The things a president has gotta do!


The 2012-16 Presidency starts off with
  • Eastern seaboard hurricane recovery.
  • Winter housing for Sandy victims.
  • A successive storm threat.
  • Israeli threats to bomb Iran.
  • Israel at risk.
  • Iranian nuclear risks.
  • A major economic recovery.
  • Global climate change.
  • An approaching energy crisis.

This list is independent of who would have been voted into office. If this isn't enough for any presidency, both Obama and Romney had their own agendas. Obama will be dealing with his own to do list for the next four years, but what would have Romney's looked like? I think it would have gone something like this.

The Romney administration would have
  • Worked to dismantle Obamacare at the federal level.
  • Dedicated federal funds to overturn a Supreme Court ruling.
  • Cut taxes to all groups.
    • While still giving special exceptions to the middle and lower class.
  • Pass a legal definition of personage.
  • Expand camp X-Ray.

Obama on the other hand, will
  • Expand Obamacare.
  • Expand legal immigration to the US.
  • Expand Federal powers in detainment of individuals.

I cannot see any major difference, since the tasks either would have had to take on is a hell of a burden and personal projects should be set aside. Ron Paul was right about the important things being set aside for minor desires. Have a happy 4 years!

Sunday, November 4, 2012

The Mission Statement - Believing in what you're doing

One of the major differences between business in America and Scandinavia is the mission statement. How business men relate to this concept can determine the success of a partnership. Understanding how your partner relates to the mission statement, how he or she thinks, can be the most valuable tool in cooperation. It can help you determine what props will need to be on the stage, what everyone needs to do their job. In these props, you find a representation for our motives, the goal and the activities to reach those goals. Understanding what motives a person has will help you have some idea what a partner will do with a prop, and how.

Of course the goal of any business is to make money, but this is unstated, understood with a nod between colleagues. When it comes down to what you and your company talks about at meetings and what you do, it will center around your mission statement. A basketball team is motivated by competition, by the fun in being the best in their region. That is the motive behind their activities. But a basketball team will become a professional team for the money it can make through ticket sales. If there was no money in playing basketball, the team would meet up for a weekend game and have a little fun before returning to their daily lives. In this example, the team's motivation for turning professional was monetary gain. With this goal comes activities, such as daily training, team management, marketing and ticket sales. Understanding the motives represented in each prop will help a partner to the team understand what part of these activities are motivated by the players having fun and what part is motivated by money and necessity. Like wise, understanding the differences in motivation between an executive at IBM and LG can help you understand what each will be willing to do for a partnership.

In the US, money is king. It is not to knock the US or the business culture there. People want to live the good life and are willing to work together to achieve great things in exchange for a bit of luxury. It can help settle differences between two rivals or two bitter combatants. People will believe in a mission statement if it brings them prosperity. An engineer at Boeing loves what he does, but he studied hard and took on professional manners for the prosperity it brings him. The same principle applies at all levels of employment in the US. You are a factory floor worker at Ford for the prosperity, not the love of what you are doing. You are an executive at Disney because you have a large paycheck, not because you love animation. The love either has for what they do is found in the activities that drove them to pursue these careers, but if they can do what they love on their time off with a paycheck, the larger the paycheck the better. In the end, money talks more than the profession and either would work in any other career if it gives them the financial and qualitative freedom to do what they want.

In Scandinavia, the motivations can be in broad strokes the same, but because very few are very rich and very few are very poor, the incentive in money in dampened. What drives people to follow a mission statement is more often the mission itself. If an engineer or designer can make the same amount of money as an artist, people will choose to take what would be a hobby in the US and turn it into a career. People want to see their own visions fulfilled more than earning a little bit more money, since the difference in prosperity is often too small to make a difference to one's motivation. This pronunciation of the mission statement's significance doesn't change the bottom line, but how you sell something should take this difference into consideration and focus on what you want to create and how you want to do it. If you understand the motivation of your audience, you can save yourself time on pitches that will fall on deaf ears.

- Servus

Friday, November 2, 2012

The value of a friendship

I tried a little experiment on FaceBook the past couple of months. With a few friends, I stopped initiating conversations. I didn't ignore my friends. I decided to let them come to me instead of me going to them. What happened? Well, I haven't spoken with them, at all, since the experiment started, until one of them sent me a link to a page about letting go of attachment. Her whole point was about how she didn't need any connections to me, so she was formally severing them. To be honest, she was among the friends I picked for that experiment because I honestly questioned the nature of that friendship before I even designed the experiment, so severing connections with her was not a real problem, which was un-friending her on FaceBook, but I do need to reflect on the past here and derive some sort of lesson. The lesson in that one case, don't be of endless utility to your friends. In fact, it is best to be of no need to your friends. Mega Tokyo put it best, when Largo replied he didn't need Erika either, tossed her a beer and continued on without blinking. If people are around you out of utility, then you are going to get hurt.

But I also haven't spoken with a couple of people I thought were going to message me within a couple of days. Seems like I misread those friendships. My concern is, that I am more of an annoyance than a pleasure for people. I don't want to waste time around people who don't enjoy my company. Annoying people is not a good way to build a positive reputation. Now I need to be oh so very careful with my other friends and figure out what the nature of those friendships is. Thing is, I actually value some of those friendships, so this part is actually gonna hurt.

Moral of the story? Be careful of who your friends are.

- Servus